This site will look much better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device.


The Savage Republican



Local Attractions

Favorite Links

Remember, Being a Savage Republican is not where you are from, but what you believe.


Previous Posts

Archives


Saturday, September 10, 2005

Anniversary of a tragedy

Tomorrow is the 4th anniversary of an American tragedy - the 9/11 attacks. To honor the passengers of Flight 93, the Discovery Channel is showing a program that "recreates" that doomed flight - based on phone conversations, voicemail messages and 9-1-1 taped calls that the passengers made on that fateful day. That is the ONLY program that the "legacy" media is doing to recognize what the day is. Meanwhile over at CNN, their attorneys are suing the government because their reporters are not being allowed to video/photograph the bodies of the dead as they are being recovered in New Orleans. Now I can certainly understand the ban. If I were searching for a relative, say I have an Uncle Beaudreaux who is missing, I certainly would not want the first word of Uncle Beaudreaux's fate to come from CNN!!!! Glenn Reynolds over at Instapundit makes another point. The same press that is suing to show my dead Uncle Beaudreaux felt that showing us the dead and dying (and jumping off of the 20 floor of WTC Tower 2) was "too upsetting" to the American people.

Now what am I missing here? Showing us the dead of Hurricane Catrina, a natural disaster is ok, but showing us the dead who were killed by a cowardly attack on civilian targets is "too upsetting"????

Friday, September 09, 2005

Howard Dean...what can you say...

More eloquent people than I have written about the DNC Chairman, the gift that keeps on givning. Hugh Hewitt, Mitch Berg, KvM just to name a few have waxed poetic on the utterances of Howard Dean. Today Chairman Dean was on "The Situation Room" with Wolf Blitzer and after reading the transcript, it is impossible not to offer a word or two.

Wolf was asking Chairman Dean about the political fall-out of the Hurricane Katrina relief efforts.

"BLITZER: Do you believe the response from the federal government, the Bush administration specifically, the president of the United States, that there were racist or racial overtones in that response? DEAN: No, I don't think so. What I do think, however, is the way our society has worked in the last 20 years -- actually, a lot longer than that, but in the last 20 years when nobody has been talking about it, is that, in fact, those below the top 20 percent in America, white, black, and brown, have been significantly disadvantaged.The average income in this country went down $1,700 since George Bush has been president for everybody under the top 20 percent. So, 80 percent of Americans saw their income drop. There's something the matter with a country that does not want to talk about what's good for 80 percent of the people and focuses on what's great for 20 percent of the people. "

Well Mr. Chairman, the Census Bureau disagrees with that. In 1999 (the last year of the Clinton Administration) the 3-year median income in the US was $40,800. In 2004, the 3 year median income was $44, 473. Now, I'm sure Chairman Dean's supporters will say "He said that it was the bottom 80% that lost money", but remember that the defination of median is that half of the people make more and half make less.

"BLITZER: What about the Democratic governor of Louisiana, and the Democratic mayor of New Orleans, how much responsibility should they have for what happened to those poor people who suffered in the immediate aftermath of those levees collapsing? DEAN: As you know, Wolf, as you know, I was governor more almost 12 years. I think we had seven or eight nine emergencies during that time, states of emergency, under three presidents. And I can tell you that what you need when there's an emergency is the National Guard. The National Guard was in Iraq. BLITZER: Well -- a third of the National Guard troops of Louisiana were, approximately, were in Iraq. DEAN: And the equipment was in Iraq. "

He just can not let go of the idea that the war in Iraq is somehow responsible for the lack of response to Katrina. Even Wolf realizes the fallacy of this meme...However it was this exchange that really struck me (emphasis mine).

"BLITZER: But there were 1,000 -- at least 1,000 school busses in New Orleans, and none of them were mobilized to get poor people, old people, people who didn't have cars, out of that city as that hurricane, Category 5, was building up steam along the -- in the Gulf of Mexico. Who should have ordered that those school busses, to get drivers and start driving people who don't have cars out of the city? DEAN: That's an easy criticism to make, because beforehand you can blame everybody. You can blame the last four or five presidents -- BLITZER: Isn't that the responsibility of the mayor or the governor? DEAN: Unless you tell people what the sequence is, I can't answer that question. I have to tell me that the sequence was that the hurricane was known to be, going to hit New Orleans directly, which it didn't. And that those busses weren't under water, and that the people who were supposed to be driving them didn't -- BLITZER: On Saturday and Sunday there was no water in New Orleans. DEAN: Right. BLITZER: And that was the -- the hurricane hit Monday morning. DEAN: You're holding the mayor -- BLITZER: On Friday they knew this could potentially hit New Orleans, and that it could be a Category 4 or 5. DEAN: You're holding the mayor to a different standard. This is a Republican spin machine stuff. You're holding the mayor to a different standard than you are holding FEMA. "

Let that sink in for a moment dear reader...Holding the Mayor of NO responsible for not following his own evacuation plan is Republican spin machine stuff....but wait! There's more...

"BLITZER: Let's talk about a comment you made. "In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina we have a clear, moral responsibility to do a better job of ensuring social and economic justice for every American, and there is still far too much that we don't know about John Roberts' record and beliefs on these critical issues."You're making a connection between Katrina and the confirmation hearings of John Roberts, which begin on Monday. And I'm not exactly sure what the point is. DEAN: My point is that John Roberts has a record. John Roberts appears to be a wonderful, decent, family person, but, again, we get back to the question about whether you really care and whether you have compassion. It's not enough to say you care. It's what you've done. John Roberts' legal career has been about taking away every protection for young girls and women who want to participate in sports, for African-Americans and Hispanics, who want the equal same right to vote as everybody else, for taking away for women who believe they should determine what kind of health care they have, instead of having politicians do it.His entire legal career appears to be about making sure those folks don't have the same rights everybody else does. That's probably not the right thing to do two weeks after a disaster, where certain members of society clearly did not have the same protections that everybody else did because of their circumstances. Americans are fair people and they want a sense of justice. I know Judge Roberts loves the law. I'm not sure he loves the American people. BLITZER: So should the Senate reject his confirmation? DEAN: Based on what I know now, absolutely, yes. "

Based on what I know Chairman Dean, you are destined to be the Chairman of a minority party. I hope that is what you want, because as long as you continue to give the Republican Party in this fashion, that is exactly what you are going to get.

Sunday, September 04, 2005

Just who is to blame for the suffering in New Orleans?

Much has been said, in recent days, about the failures that caused the massive human suffering in New Orleans apre Katrina. As I stated here there is certainly more than enough blame to go around, and most of it should start with the Mayor of New Orleans and the Governor of Louisiana, but that some blame could rightly be laid on a federal doorstep. The Manchester (NH) Union Leader had an interesting editorial that to addresses the issue of just who is at fault for the levee failure and the lack of funds to bring the levees up to a standard that could withstand the storm surge of a Cat 5 hurricane (I will give you a hint and say that they do not blame President Bush). Many, myself included, have opined that those who stayed in New Orleans after the evacuation order was issued should also share some blame for their state of suffering. Thanks to Captain Ed at Captains' Quarters blog, I have to say that I was wrong, wrong, WRONG in making that statement. Captain Ed had a post this morning that talks about the NOLA comprehensive emergency evacuation plan that was developed in September of 2004! The evacuation plan can be found here and it lays out precisely who is responsible for rolling the busses in order for the poor and feeble to be able to evacuate should the need arise. According to the comprehensive plan, the Mayor of New Orleans is not only responsible for declaring the need to evacuate, he (or she) is supposed to have a SOP in place to cover the evacuation needs of those who are unable to evacuate on their own! In other words, Mayor Nagin is the one who needs to stand up and take responsibility for the state of his city! Mayor Nagin should have and could have prevented the suffering of the people of NOLA. Not the governor, not the President, not the National Guard, no one but Mayor Nagin himself. Considering that Mayor Nagin was elected in 2002, he certainly has no one to blame but himself for not being prepared for a storm that "everyone expected to come eventually"!

My Sermon for today

Over the last few days we have heard certain "Christians" saying that the hurricane was proof that God had removed his hand of protection from a) the US and b) New Orleans for allowing sin to run rampant in our cities. Jihadists are saying that the hurricane was Allah's punishment on us for our wickeness. Now there is no way that I am going to presume to speak for God, because I have seen what he has done in the past to people who presume to speak in His name and do not speak His truth. However, what I will do is, through the words He has given us in His book (the Bible), try to answer those who say that this is God's punishment on a wicked America....

God has indeed shown us what he will do to wicked cities, as he did with Sodom and Gomorrah, however, when God did choose to punish these wicked cities He also allowed the righteous (Lot and his family) escape the punishment (Gen 19). However this hurricane hit good people just as hard as it hit those who are wicked. Jesus tells his followers (in John16:33) "in this world you will have trouble but take heart, for I have overcome the world!", so how can we definatively say that this is God's punishment when we know that trouble will come to all? After all, Jesus (in one of his many parables) says in Luke 11:11 "If a son asks for bread from his father, would he give the child a stone? or if he asks for a fish, will he be given a serpent? or if he asks for an egg be instead given a scorpion? If you then who are wicked know how to give good things to your children: how much more will your Heavenly Father (who is good) give to those who ask him?"

To those that would judge, I would like to respectfully remind them of what Jesus said in Matthew 7:1 - "Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way that you judge others, you will be judged!" Instead of looking to God's word for judgement, how about we turn to it for hope and instruction on how to move forward. Psalms 38:15 says "For in you, O Lord, do I hope; you will hear me, O God." and Psalms 41:1 says "Blessed is he who has regard for the weak, for the Lord delivers him in time of trouble".